On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:48:08PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > > Also, I'm just wondering: why did you remove the dependency on > "bash"? Maybe I'm being silly, but I figure it does really depend on > it. bash is Essential and you don't explicitely depend on essential packages but assume it's there anyway. > (Other Debian mentors -- is it okay to upload a package whose > version is 0.2-3 or 0.2-4 as the first Debian upload? Or should we > instead rewrite history and pretend this is 0.2-1 when it's ready to > go?) There are some of the sponsors around demanding to increase the debian version for every change of a package that hit mentors and others that want a version just after the one in the archive. Cheers Christoph -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon : GPG-Key ID: 0xD49AE731 \ / Campaign : CaCert Assurer X against HTML : Debian Maintainer / \ in eMails : http://www.debian.org/ http://www.christoph-egger.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature