Re: Reforming 'orig.tar.gz' with included tar-ball.
Joachim Wiedorn <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Mats Erik Andersson <email@example.com> wrote:
>> To my dismay the previous maintainer chose to let the 'orig.tar.gz'-file
>> contain the packaged and compressed upstream tar archive. My personal
>> taste is to abondon this practice, if for no other reason to simplify
>> the rules-file.
> I know one reason: inside the upstream package are binary files, which
> must be created new while packaging ("build") and then the original
> binary files of upstream get lost ... This seems to be independent of
> the package format.
> For me the solution would be: creating a reduced orig.tar.gz file
> without those binaries. Would be this the right way?
> Fondest regards,
> Joachim Wiedorn
Then you delete them in clean and ignore the dpkg-source output about
"ignoring deletion of stupid/binary".
Unless the binaries are not illegal to distribute in main or overly big
they are no reason why the upstream.tar must be repacked.