Hi
Dne Wed, 2 Dec 2009 21:51:52 +0100
Jakub Wilk <ubanus@users.sf.net> napsal(a):
> * Michal Čihař <nijel@debian.org>, 2009-11-30, 13:39:
> >> Possibly this exact version is not needed. I was just following this
> >> part of /usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz:
> >>
> >> > For automake 1.6 and above, and newest autoconf:
> >> [...]
> >> > - Call the automake suite using *versioned* names ("automake-1.9", etc),
> >> > OR use autoreconf, but set the environment variables accordingly to
> >> > the versioned names. Otherwise, you may get a higher version than
> >> > what you expected. If you know your Makefile.am files are very well
> >> > behaved, and will not break with a newer automake, versioned names are
> >> > optional.
> >>
> >> Upstream is apparently using 1.9.6 so I thought it was the safest choice
> >> to hardcode automake-1.9.
> >
> >Okay, I usually assume the Makefile.am is not that broken so it won't
> >work in next version and use current automake.
>
> If you insist, I can convert the package to use current automake.
I really do not insist in this, rather I currently don't have time to
look at the package deeper.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature