Re: Debian changelog vs upstream changelog
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:50:30AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Rather, it would be good to have a facility similar to the way the
> Debian changelog is currently available: have the upstream changelog
> published in a predictable location by package name.
Where the changelog is already part of the source package and has a
sensible name, and the package calls dh_installchangelogs, it's already
installed as /usr/share/doc/*/changelog and the Debian changelog as
changelog.Debian. The only unpredictable part of that is whether upstream
enclosed one in the first place.
1024D: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51