Re: Re: RFS: stx-btree
Hello,
>> * your binary-indep should not depend on targets that try compile the test-
>> suites (speedtest, wxbtreedemo, testsuite), but should only install
>> architecture independent parts of the source package into the corresponding
>> -dev (headers files containing templates) and -doc (doxygen files) binary
>> packages.
>> * your binary-arch can compile the test-suites and eventually clean the
>> resulting object files
..
>>Also, at some later point you might decide to split a
>>separate wxbtreedemo binary package (arch:any) so it must be handled by
>>binary-arch anyway (debian policy 4.7).
yes, i make a package for wxbtreedemo (in binary-arch)
binary-indep now doesn't compile anything (can be run just after a configure)
>> * there are some more build-dependencies (wx, cppunit) you could add related
>> to test-suites, though configure script handles these gracefully if they are
>> not present, but you want to run the test-suite after all ;-).
yes, i made changes in rules to run testsuite in install-arch, or
maybe better to
run tests in build ?
>>* debian/copyright is incomplete - there are GPL-2'ed source files in
>>wxbtreedemo directory (licensecheck -r . from devscripts package might be of
>>service). Also, /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL is a symlink, you want to use
>>LGPL-2.1 in your copyright file, same for GPL-2.
i make a notice about 2 parts of package, but i fail to find a sample,
can you help a bit
if my copyright file is wrong again?
the rest of changes looks to be simple )
thanks for you help.
Reply to: