i catch the point
i have no need to modify the source package name .. it can be
'libsockets++'
the builded package name can be 'libsockets++2' (due to debian-policy
8.1) and 'libsockets++-dev'
in future releases... builded: 'libsockets++3' and 'libsockets++-dev'
i have a question: in the next releases of debian there may be 2
versions of my package ('libsockets++2' and 'libsockets++3')???
?????
i suppose the answer is positive if i ask a sponsor to upload the
packages, but if question is some sponsor uploaded my package today
(libsockets++2) and there is an update tomorrow (libsockets++3) and
there is another package depending on (libsockets++2)???
would be better idea if I created the package "libsockets++' and
'libsockets++-dev'???
thanks...
El jue, 13-08-2009 a las 00:09 +0200, Sandro Tosi escribió:
> 2009/8/12 Leinier Cruz Salfran <salfrancl@ipigto.rimed.cu>:
> > I changed the source package name.
> >
> > I readed [1] .. Correct me if I'm wrong, please
>
> well, if you ask, you should wait for a reply...
>
> > I can send a mail to 'control@bugs.debian.org' with body:
> >
> > reassign 539568 libsockets++2 2.3.5
>
> no, 'wnpp' metapackage is the correct one to use for ITPs
>
> > retitle 539568 libsockets++2: C++ sockets class library
>
> is this the same title as before (hint: "ITP: libsockets++ -- C++
> sockets wrapper library") with only the package name changed? (hint:
> no) - retitle it correctly.
>
> Moreover, why adding the '2' to the package name? (I didn't follow the
> thread that lead to this package rename).
>
> > ????
>
> one question mark is more the enough to express a question.
>
> > Thanks....
>
> welcome
>
> --
> Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
> My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
> Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
>
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente