i catch the point i have no need to modify the source package name .. it can be 'libsockets++' the builded package name can be 'libsockets++2' (due to debian-policy 8.1) and 'libsockets++-dev' in future releases... builded: 'libsockets++3' and 'libsockets++-dev' i have a question: in the next releases of debian there may be 2 versions of my package ('libsockets++2' and 'libsockets++3')??? ????? i suppose the answer is positive if i ask a sponsor to upload the packages, but if question is some sponsor uploaded my package today (libsockets++2) and there is an update tomorrow (libsockets++3) and there is another package depending on (libsockets++2)??? would be better idea if I created the package "libsockets++' and 'libsockets++-dev'??? thanks... El jue, 13-08-2009 a las 00:09 +0200, Sandro Tosi escribió: > 2009/8/12 Leinier Cruz Salfran <salfrancl@ipigto.rimed.cu>: > > I changed the source package name. > > > > I readed [1] .. Correct me if I'm wrong, please > > well, if you ask, you should wait for a reply... > > > I can send a mail to 'control@bugs.debian.org' with body: > > > > reassign 539568 libsockets++2 2.3.5 > > no, 'wnpp' metapackage is the correct one to use for ITPs > > > retitle 539568 libsockets++2: C++ sockets class library > > is this the same title as before (hint: "ITP: libsockets++ -- C++ > sockets wrapper library") with only the package name changed? (hint: > no) - retitle it correctly. > > Moreover, why adding the '2' to the package name? (I didn't follow the > thread that lead to this package rename). > > > ???? > > one question mark is more the enough to express a question. > > > Thanks.... > > welcome > > -- > Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu) > My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ > Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente