[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: libsockets++



Hola Mauro,

I updated the packages following Ansgar and your instructions and within
'pbuilder' environment build also.

Can you check it?

- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libsockets++
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libsockets
++/libsockets++_2.3.5-1.dsc

Regards ;)


El lun, 10-08-2009 a las 22:02 -0300, Mauro Lizaur escribió:
> Hola Leinier,
> 
> El 2009-08-10, Leinier Cruz Salfran escribio:
> 
> > Dear mentors,
> > 
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libsockets++".
> > 
> > * Package name    : libsockets++
> >   Version         : 2.3.5
> >   Upstream Author : grymse@alhem.net
> > * URL             : http://www.alhem.net/Sockets/
> > * License         : GPL
> >   Section         : libs
> > 
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > libsockets++ - C++ sockets class library
> > libsockets++-dev - C++ sockets class library - development files
> > 
> 
> I haven't built this lib but at a quick glance:
> 
> - The package (most likely) should be non-native, and yours is a native.
> - Try to improve the copyright file.
>  - It misses the license, also if the lib license is the GPL v1, you 
>    should provide the full license since it isn't available anymore in
>    /usr/share/common-licenses/, note the GPL symlink points to the v3.
>  - the line with the copyright author isn't well formatted.
>  - the upstream author is incomplete
>  Take a look at this thread[0], which may be useful.
> - Update the standards-version
> - since you're using debhelper 7, there's no need to use 'dh_clean -k' in
>   debian/rules, use 'dh_prep' instead.
> 
> Perhaps i'm missing something more, but i'll leave it to you 
> (and lintian, hint.)
> 
> [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
> 
> Saludos,
> Mauro
> 
> --
> JID: lavaramano@jabber.org | http://lusers.com.ar/
> 2B82 A38D 1BA5 847A A74D 6C34 6AB7 9ED6 C8FD F9C1
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente


Reply to: