[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: azureus (updated package)

I'll fix the remaining bugs manually when I confirm that they are 
a) fixed upstream
b) merged
c) no longer relevant.

So, it's true that I might have skipped sending through mentors, but I
want as many eyes as possible.

Yes Shaun RFA'ed azureus a while ago, he was helping me with reviewing
it, (along with swt-gtk). Hope that answers your question.

Thanks for all. Best regards.

On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 14:35 -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Adrian Perez<adrianperez.deb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The upload would fix these bugs: 329018, 398014, 409952, 412213, 491624, 515015, 516059
> What about:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509880
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506027
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496461
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450942
> (...)
> There are many bugs, I know, but it'd be nice if you could at least
> reply to them, giving that you are adopting the package.
> I also wonder about the adoption, what happened?  Did Shaun give it up or what?
> Is the package going to be team-maintained now?  If so, I doubt that
> you need to send it through mentors.
> -- 
> Besos,
> Marga
Best regards, 

Adrian Perez <adrianperez.deb@gmail.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: