[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Automated package build-and-test tools for Debian package maintainers (was: pbuilder: The following packages have unmet dependencies)



In <87bpmvsux5.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au>, Ben Finney wrote:
>That is, if I'm maintaining packages for Debian and want to build and
>test them in an easy and automated manner, what tools are available
>(‘pbuilder’, ‘sbuild’, ‘cowbuilder’, …) and for each of them why would I
>choose that one?

There's really only two that I know of.  pbuilder (and variants: 
qemubuilder, cowbuilder, etc.) and sbuild.  ISTR, sbuild is used on the 
buildds, but all my experience is with pbuilder.  I find it incredibly 
flexible when needed but also very easy to get started with a minimum of 
documentation reading.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.           	 ,= ,-_-. =.
bss@iguanasuicide.net            	((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy 	 `-'(. .)`-'
http://iguanasuicide.net/        	     \_/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: