Re: RFS: lives
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 04:27:42PM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 08:59:27AM +0100, Harry Rickards wrote:
> >> Then 17 minutes later I got another email from the Archive Administrator
> >> at 23:04 saying:
> >>
> >> Rejected: lives_1.0.0-3.dsc refers to lives_1.0.0.orig.tar.gz, but I
> >> can't find it in the queue or in the pool.
> >>
> >>
> >> ===
> >>
> >> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
> >> your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
> >> concerns.
> >>
> >>
> >> Is that something I've done wrong or something you've done wrong?
> >
> > It's my fault, I forgot to include the orig.tar.gz.
> >
> Okay. Again, thanks for uploading. In the emails I've got from the
> Archive Administrator, it's always saying amd64. Does the packaging
> system build an i386 deb as well (and if not, would it be possible for
> you to upload one)?
It's automated, see http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Reply to: