Re: RFS: agedu
Thanks for taking a look at the package!
I believe I addressed all the issues correctly in the version I just
uploaded now. See below for details :)
Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
>> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> Appearances are deceptive. :-) Run a recent version of lintian with
> the -iIv options to see more!
Oh I only used -i :) I fixed the additional warnings, see below.
> - the manpage uses a hyphen instead of a minus sign
Indeed, I corrected those.
> - there is no debian/watch file
Yes, this also bothered me ;)
The website of the program only puts a direct link to a file. There is
no directory index containing all versions that uscan would be able to
parse. So I believe I cannot build a correct watch file.
As lintian suggested I created an empty watch file with a comment inside
to explain this situation. I hope this is ok?
> - the standards version is 3.8.0 whereas it should be 3.8.1
There don't see to be changes that apply to my packaging, so I just
incremented the Standards-Version to 3.8.1 now.
> - The word "Copyright" or the unicode copyright symbol should
> appear in the copyright file
Fixed that now.
> P.S. It would be nice if the key with which you sign the dsc file was
> in some public place like the keyrings at keys.gnupg.net or
> pgp.mit.edu
Oops, I wasn't aware it didn't spread yet... I uploaded it to some
keyserver in the past but that wasn't enouph apparently :) Now it's
available at pgp.mit.edu and keys.gnupg.net too.
Anything else that keeps my package from getting sponsored?;)
Regards,
Alexander
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: agedu
- From: Alexander Prinsier <aphexer@mailhaven.com>
- Re: RFS: agedu
- From: Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in>