Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Neil Williams [090426 13:50 +0100]
>> The RFS wasn't sufficiently interesting.
>> Tell sponsors why they should care about the package - your initial RFS
>> was bare, incomplete and just plain uninteresting.
> Hey, my package is an update.
You didn't say that clearly in the first message.
Nevertheless, tt still helps to say something about the package. At
least its long description.
< doogie> asuffield: how do you think dpkg was originally written? :|
< asuffield> by letting iwj get dangerously near a computer
-- in #debian-devel
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI