Re: questions regarding libmimelib1 as seperate source package
Jonas Meurer <jonas@freesources.org> writes:
> - I bumbed the library version to 1.1.4 and kept soname libmimelib.so.1
> from the libmimelib1c2a package. The source changes I made where
> simple strlcpy() -> strncpy() migration, so a soname bump should not
> be necessary.
Just to double-check, you added explicit nul termination for all strings
as an additional line of code when making that change, correct? (I
personally prefer to ship a replacement strlcpy function rather than
using strncpy, since the strncpy semantics are rather broken.)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: