Hi, I've been seeing this for the past two weeks: http://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=dante libdsocksd0/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libc6.1.1 (>> 2.9) libsocksd0/alpha unsatisfiable Depends: libc6.1.1 (>> 2.9) ...and I'm not exactly sure what the problem is. Okay, so I see that libc6 has some weirdness on alpha (building a libc6.1 instead of libc6), but still I'm really not sure where the libc6.1.1 instead of libc6.1 comes from. What should I do now? - look for a problem in debhelper 7 on alpha (shlibds:Depends generation) - look for a problem in the build hardening wrapper on alpha - look for a problem in dante's control file (but it's just shlibs:Depends and misc:Depends for those two libraries) - poke and anger the wanna-build gods to do something by hand - just wait patiently? :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@space.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical.
Attachment:
pgpuJS5NnPk0D.pgp
Description: PGP signature