On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:04:23PM +0200, David Paleino wrote: > I'm *NOT* talking in behalf of the Debian Mono Group, but I really think we > shouldn't break existing scripts/programs/workflows/whatever, and call our > binary as cli-csc. Hi guys, according to this message and the previous ones posted in this thread, I think we can try to reach a consensus without taking this discussion on -devel. I have the feeling we all agree that best solution right now it's to revert the naming change in the mono-devel package, but I'd like to hear an "official" statement from the Mono team, is it OK for you guys? I know, it's not the perfect solution, but it's the most near to it, I guess. Thanks in advance. Regards, -- Davide Puricelli, dpuricelli@tin.it Debian Developer: evo@debian.org | http://www.debian.org Time looked like snow dropping silently into a black room -- Ray Bradbury
Attachment:
pgpN3Uj272oD5.pgp
Description: PGP signature