Neil Williams wrote: > On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:01:42 +0000 > Lazarus Long <lazarus.long@bigfoot.com> wrote: >> In general your point is correct, but this is a native package, so >> nobody else could be applying to package it. > > That is not the point. Developers respond to your intent according to > similar packages that already exist, errors in the ITP itself, problems > with name clashes and almost anything else that may come up. > > Every package needs an ITP, native doesn't make any difference. > >> Regarding if it's good >> enough to go in the archive, that's one point of requesting sponsorship, >> right? :) > > No. The ITP is separate - it gets to a wider audience. Thank you very much for clarifying it. Regards, -- Lazarus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature