Am Freitag, den 03.10.2008, 23:45 +1000 schrieb Ben Finney: > Jann Horn <jannhorn@googlemail.com> writes: > > > I changed the rules, you're right. I did so because of this report: > > Your package does not seem to be lintian clean. > > 'lintian' is a tool to verify if source package contain obvious > > packaging errors. These warnings/errors were found: > > W: cdarch source: binary-arch-rules-but-pkg-is-arch-indep > > N: > > N: It looks like you try to run code in the binary-arch target > > of > > N: debian/rules, even though your package is architecture- > > independent. > > How can I avoid this without crashing the rules? > > You should always have both ‘binary-arch’ and ‘binary-indep’ targets > in your ‘debian/rules’ file. > > If your package produces architecture-independent packages, put > appropriate actions in the ‘binary-indep’ target. Otherwise, leave > that target empty. > > If your package produces architecture-dependent packages, put > appropriate actions in the ‘binary-arch’ target. Otherwise, leave that > target empty. > > -- > \ “Simplicity and elegance are unpopular because they require | > `\ hard work and discipline to achieve and education to be | > _o__) appreciated.” —Edsger W. Dijkstra | > Ben Finney > > Thanks, now it works! Jann Horn
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil