[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: replaceit (#490695)



On Sunday 24 August 2008 21:49:34 Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 09:37:01PM +0300, George Danchev wrote:
--cut--
> No, that's fine. I'll close it when it goes in (presumably I'll get a
> mail when it does?)

Yes, we will be mailed about that.

> I have another package that's almost ready for feedback. Woud you
> prefer to see it or should I advertise an RFS? Not sure what the
> protocol is here.

Well, basically it is always better to get as much public peer review as you 
can, so RFS to mentors is the preferred protocol. Also, there is no single 
person who is ready to sponsor everything; for example I won't sponsor stuff 
I don't intent to use, don't understand or hate with passion (php, java or 
web apps) but another sponsor will do. So, to summarize; the more eyes, the 
better ;-)

-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB 2003-03-18 <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>


Reply to: