DEHS bug report [was Re: Question about watch-file]

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: DEHS bug report [was Re: Question about watch-file]
From: "David L. Anselmi" <anselmi@anselmi.us>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:03:47 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 48756E03.4030306@anselmi.us>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 877ibvv38l.fsf@benfinney.id.au>
References: <[🔎] 487223B3.4070808@gmail.com> <[🔎] 87zlotwyu6.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <[🔎] 20080708112018.GA5976@maggie.lan> <[🔎] 87skukv7ar.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <[🔎] 20080709083823.GA5966@maggie.lan> <[🔎] 877ibvv38l.fsf@benfinney.id.au>

Ben Finney wrote:
[...]

DEHS already clearly shows packages for which the upstream version
can't be checked; e.g. see
<URL:http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/maintainer.php?name=lojban-common>.


What does "Tot Upstream Bugs:" mean?

E.g., for html2ps there are 10 bugs tagged upstream but DEHS reports 0.So it must mean something else. But what?


Thanks,
Dave

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DEHS bug report [was Re: Question about watch-file]
  - From: Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com>

References:
- Question about watch-file
  - From: Mauro Lizaur <lavaramano@gmail.com>
- Re: Question about watch-file
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
- Re: Question about watch-file
  - From: Patrick Schoenfeld <schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com>
- Re: Question about watch-file
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
- Re: Question about watch-file
  - From: Patrick Schoenfeld <schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com>
- Re: Question about watch-file
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Question about watch-file
Next by Date: Re: DEHS bug report [was Re: Question about watch-file]
Previous by thread: Re: Question about watch-file
Next by thread: Re: DEHS bug report [was Re: Question about watch-file]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread