Re: RFS: swath 0.3.3-1 (updated package)
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
<thep@linux.thai.net> wrote:
> This may be better done by a new upstream release.
Indeed.
> In fact, using mkstemp() instead of tmpnam() means quite substantial
> change to the program logic, because the temp files are actually
> created deep in different functions in different branches, using
> the generated temp names from a single place. Changing that behavior
> would mean internal API changes.
>
> I will come up with a new upstream version soon, then.
Ah, hopefully it will not be too much work.
> > Have you considered applying for DM?
> >
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Maintainers
>
> Yes, I'll apply soon, but probably not before this upload.
> I would like to have the regression fixed sooner.
Fair enough.
> BTW, do you think I should raise the urgency from low to medium,
> although it does not fix any RC bug in Debian BTS? The regression
> was reported upstream, not in Debian BTS, but it must have been a
> grave bug had it been filed. It's a total loss of functionality.
I think that would be acceptable.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: