Re: Listing dependencies with specific versions
In article <email@example.com>,
Neil Williams<firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Can someone confirm / deny my understanding here? As I say, I'm very
>> new to all this.
> Sorry to inflict my mistake upon you. It happens to everyone at some
Whoops. It appears the mistake is mine. Picture support was actually added
in flac 1.1.3, not 1.2.0 as I thought.
My .deb however doesn't depend on a specific version of libflac, is that
because there are no versions prior to this available?