Re: RFS: libmsn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/11/15 Pau Garcia i Quiles :
>
>> It builds these binary packages:
>> libmsn - high-level C++ library for MSN Messenger [runtime]
>> libmsn-dbg - high-level C++ library for MSN Messenger [debug]
>> libmsn-dev - high-level C++ library for MSN Messenger [devel]
>
> Some quick comments:
>
> You shouldn't call your runtime library just libmsn, see [1]. You
> definitely shouldn't get rid of that lintian's message with an
> override.
I have renamed the package to 'libmsn0.1'.
Upstream is planning some changes that might affect the API and might
require soversion changes. I used just 'libmsn' not to flood the
archive with 'libmsn0.1', 'libmsn0.2', etc packages in the near
future.
> The package is GPL without any special clauses and links against
> OpenSSL. OpenSSL license is not compatible with GPL AFAIK
Upstream just added following text to their license:
In addition to the license terms of the GNU General Public License,
as copied below, the developers of libmsn give you permission
to link the code of this release of libmsn with the OpenSSL project's
"OpenSSL" library (or with modified versions of it that use the same
license as the "OpenSSL" library), and distribute the linked executables.
You must obey the GNU General Public License in all respects for all of the
code used other than "OpenSSL". If you modify this file, you may
extend this exception to your version of the file, but you are not
obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception
statement from your version.
So I'm packaging libmsn 4.0 beta 1 + svn rev. 69
Thanks your for reviewing the package. A new version will be available
soon in mentors.
> [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/
>
> Greetings,
> Miry
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFJIvrv/DzYv9iGJzsRAvcSAKCvNJQFcR4eO/VQNbaQWhETMZCNewCeOMTJ
ea3yF7KPFA4iiGuCZxAfjLY=
=70Cs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: