Re: building for 'any' architecture?

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: building for 'any' architecture?
From: "Paul Wise" <pabs@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 20:02:04 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] e13a36b30809210502o7a15debetb9a52160755b2e70@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200809211358.49494.michael.renner@gmx.de>
References: <[🔎] 200809211341.31073.michael.renner@gmx.de> <[🔎] 1221997316.5294.25.camel@sp-laptop3.sp-local> <[🔎] 200809211358.49494.michael.renner@gmx.de>

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Michael Renner <michael.renner@gmx.de> wrote:

> Architecture: any

Use 'all' not 'any'.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: building for 'any' architecture?
  - From: Michael Renner <michael.renner@gmx.de>

References:
- building for 'any' architecture?
  - From: Michael Renner <michael.renner@gmx.de>
- Re: building for 'any' architecture?
  - From: Stephan Peijnik <debian@sp.or.at>
- Re: building for 'any' architecture?
  - From: Michael Renner <michael.renner@gmx.de>

Prev by Date: Re: building for 'any' architecture?
Next by Date: Re: building for 'any' architecture?
Previous by thread: Re: building for 'any' architecture?
Next by thread: Re: building for 'any' architecture?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread