Re: Choosing a sensible name for a new package split from octave3.0

[Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>]

Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> writes:

> We are discussing about the most appropriate name from the new
> binary package. The names that came up are the following, each one
> with some cons:
[…]

>     octave3.0-common (although, this package will not be "common" to several
>         other, only to octave3.0)

This would be my preference. It's common across architectures, which
is a sensible enough semantic fit.

-- 
 \      “The most merciful thing in the world… is the inability of the |
  `\        human mind to correlate all its contents.” —Howard Philips |
_o__)                                                        Lovecraft |
Ben Finney