David Paleino scrisse: > For the experimental upload, I've added a new changelog entry to > debian/changelog, tagging it as "experimental", created a new > branch, ..., and finally uploaded. > For the next unstable upload, should I keep both changelogs forked? > Should I merge them? The same question applies to the next > experimental upload. I think it depends on how you manage your packages. I personally use experimental as test staging area; when I found out what's stable and what not, I'll collapse all the little experimental-changelogs into a single one for unstable, with a summary of the appropriate things enabled. Instead if you use in parallel sid and experimental for two upstream branches, when the second one become stable and ready for sid, I'd say you can safely keep all your previous experimental changelogs there too. > Secondly, I've just adopted john. The old maintainer kept 1.6.x > series in unstable, and a "1.7-2" in experimental. Now I've uploaded > 1.7.2-1 into unstable, will the experimental version disappear? > Should I request its removal (and if yes, how)? See http://wiki.debian.org/ftpmaster_Removals > Thanks, > David Ciao, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno : :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Attachment:
pgpVv5I3EZkjJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature