[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: xiterm+thai (updated package)



เมื่อ พฤ. 2008-04-17 เวลา 11:27 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan เขียน
ว่า:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > >  for X11/Intrinsic.h in the configure script and investigate why the
> >  >  build doesn't fail when it isn't present. It looks like the return
> >  >  value from make in the src subdir isn't getting passed out to the
> >  >  top-level make process somehow.
> >
> >  Looks like this in the upstream makefile:
> >
> >  all allbin alldoc tags clean:
> >         @for I in ${subdirs}; do (cd $$I; ${MAKE} $@ || exit 1); done
> >
> >  Should be replaced with this:
> >
> >  all allbin alldoc tags clean:
> >         @for I in ${subdirs}; do (cd $$I; ${MAKE} $@) || exit 1; done
> >
> >  Same for the other targets in the Makefile.in that have a similar construct.
> 
> Indeed. Thanks for pointing out.
> 
> For the Xt dependency, it was missed during libSM and libICE removal.
> Indeed, xt needs to be checked in the configure script, in addition to x11.
> And hopefully, -Wl,--as-needed can prevent libSM and libICE from being
> pulled in along with libxt again.

It's also my faults that I guess the libxt is not linked due to the
libSM and libICE linkages was removed, therefore I remove the build-dep
of libxt-dev from the debian/control in the latest upload. In the
meantime for my computer, the libxt-dev has been installed before so the
FTBFS not happen.
Sorry that I never make a deeply check it.

In the next time, I will build it in the pbuilder for sure.

Regards,
Neutron Soutmun

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B8=99=E0=B8=B5=E0=B9=88=E0=B8=84=E0=B8=B7=E0=B8=AD?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B8=AA=E0=B9=88=E0=B8=A7=E0=B8=99=E0=B8=82=E0=B9=89?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B8=AD=E0=B8=84=E0=B8=A7=E0=B8=B2=E0=B8=A1=E0=B8=97?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B8=B5=E0=B9=88=E0=B8=A1=E0=B8=B5=E0=B8=A5=E0=B8=B2?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B8=A2=E0=B9=80=E0=B8=8B=E0=B9=87=E0=B8=99=E0=B8=94?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B8=B4=E0=B8=88=E0=B8=B4=E0=B8=97=E0=B8=B1=E0=B8=A5?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E0=B8=81=E0=B8=B3=E0=B8=81=E0=B8=B1=E0=B8=9A?=


Reply to: