Il giorno Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:08:57 +0530 Kapil Hari Paranjape <kapil@imsc.res.in> ha scritto: > Its a while since I played around with GPG but IIRC, the sub-keys are > signed (and thus revoked) by the signing key. So having access to the > signing key ought to be enough to generate a revocation certificate > for an encryption key. Let me check. You are right. In fact, seahorse (the GUI I usually use), didn't let me revoke the subkey. I then did everything with `gpg --edit-key`, and seems like everything went fine. :) Thanks, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://snipr.com/qa_page `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature