[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ITR: ustr (update for existing package)

On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 12:07 +0100, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> Hey Neil,
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:02:40AM +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Good, that's the kind of RFS I like to see - just one thing missing,
> > this is an existing package:
> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/ustr.html
> just a quick note (and question): He indicated that this package isn't
> new, by using the "updated package" subject. Shouldn't this be suffice?

I'd say not quite. (updated package) can refer to an ITP that has been
partially reviewed, re-uploaded to mentors and is awaiting further
review before the first upload to Debian.

It's getting a bit like splitting hairs from here on but I suppose the
full answer would be to use:

RFS: $package (updated NEW package)
RFS: $package (updated existing package)
or (update for existing package)


Neil Williams

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: