[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: gnomecatalog



On mié, 2008-01-09 at 19:14 +0100, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> El mié, 09-01-2008 a las 18:24 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno escribió:
> > On mié, 2008-01-09 at 12:21 +0000, Neil Williams wrote: 
> > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:29 +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:02:02PM +0100, José Sánchez Moreno wrote:
> > > > > Dear mentors,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnomecatalog".
> > > > > 
> > > > > * Package name    : gnomecatalog
> > > > >   Version         : 0.3.1-1.0
> > > > 
> > > > > That '.0' at the end isn't necessary.
> > > > 
> > > > Lintian notify a warning without it.
> > > > 
> > > > I can remove it if you want
> > > 
> > > The lintian warning is there for a reason, but adding .0 is not the
> > > correct fix.
> > > 
> > > Is this the NMU warning?
> > > 
> > > You may have a mismatch between Maintainer: and debian/changelog. You
> > > must use exactly the same name and email address in debian/changelog as
> > > you use in debian/control.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Many thanks. I have correct the issue. 
> > 
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/
> 
> Hi José, just a couple of questions:
> - Compiling the package on debian sid, it fails because of the python
> stuff in debian/rules. You're forcing using python 2.5 in debian/rules
> but there's not such build-dependency. Removing the
> "DEB_PYTHON_COMPILE_VERSION = 2.5" line, the package compiles perfectly
> with 2.4, so I don't understand that line.
> Anyway , the package does not follow current Debian Python policy, you
> should take a look to http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/NewPolicy.
> For this package, current Python policy is quite simple so you should
> not have any problem to fix it, if you have some questions don't doubt
> in asking to this list. I would recommend you using python-support as
> replacing dh_python by python-support is trivial.
> 
> - Your postinst is maintaining some old debhelper generated code and it
> should be deleted. In fact, you can test that this is all you need in
> the file:
> #!/bin/sh
> #DEBHELPER#
> 
> - Please, remove the commented lines in debian/rules as they're useless.
> 
> - I've seen you have not a spanish comment in the .desktop file of the
> application. According to your name it seems you can add it :-). If not,
> tell it to me and I'll send the right spanish sentence to you.
> 
> Regards.
> José L.
> 

I think. I have solves all issues with the package.

http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gnomecatalog/

Best Regards



Reply to: