[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager



Hi Leo,

Il giorno ven, 23/11/2007 alle 23.37 +0100, Leo "costela" Antunes ha
scritto:
> Francesco Namuri wrote:
> > I've added it to svn, but I get the same warnings...
> 
> >> Also, lintian is complaining about a RPATH set to /usr/lib. I
didn't
> >> delve into it, but this seems like a real error.
> >> Does it have a good reason to do it, that I failed to see?
> > 
> > About this, I've no idea I check all packages with lintian after the
> > build, I don't get any warning or info, I run lintian with -I -i
> > always... :\
> 
> I've just done a second build inside pbuilder, with a clean orig
> downloaded from upstream and the RPATH issue still shows up. Are you
> using pbuilder? Are you sure your orig is not tampered in any way?
> Which arch are you building on?

I'm building it for i386, I use pbuilder to build the deb.
I've re-downloaded the tar.gz and it's identical to the old one.
Maybe the rpath issue is not i386 related?

> Taking a fast look inside the configure script, it seems to set RPATH
in
> many different cases, including the default when the build arch can't
be
> determined. In this case I would use chrpath to clean it after the
build
> and advise upstream to cleanup the configure script.
> 
> What do you think?

I've never used chrpath, I'm reading http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue
to learn something about the problem.

How to implement it using cdbs? adding a common-install-arch rule?
Somethink like:

common-install-arch::
        chrpath --delete
debian/gnome-phone-manager/usr/bin/gnome-phone-manager

Thanks for the help...

Cheers,
francesco

-- 
Francesco Namuri
francesco(at)namuri(dot)it   http://namuri.it/
id gpg key: 21A4702A         accipiter@jabber.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Questa =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente


Reply to: