Hi, * Raphael Geissert <atomo64+debian@gmail.com> [2007-07-01 21:51]: [...] > >> By the way, what do you think about making linda check the > >> package too? > > > >Linda itself is too buggy I think. Linda is not bad but when > >looking at the past I came to a point where I stopped using > >it because of its bugs. > > I have an alias in my .bashrc which helps me with this stuff: > > alias checkdeb='linda -i *.deb; linda -i *.dsc; lintian -i -I > *.deb; > lintian -i -I *.dsc' > > The only "problem" I've found with linda is that when checking > the source of a package it sometimes complains about duplicate files > like: > > W: zend-framework; The font > zend-framework-1.0.0-RC2/tests/Zend/Pdf/_fonts/Vera.ttf in > package ttf-bitstream-vera is considered to be a duplicate. > The font shown above is considered to be a duplicate of a > commonly available font. > > even tough those files aren't included in the final .deb Linda has way too much false-positives (the above is just one example) which is really bad. bugs.debian.org/linda vs bugs.debian.org/lintian does look like this as well. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html
Attachment:
pgp4mfjwq16Oa.pgp
Description: PGP signature