On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 11:44:00PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote: > My mistake, I missed that it's a static library. However, the binary > in /usr/bin - is it useful on its own or just used to configure something > about the library. It's useful on it's own, but IMHO way too trivial to put into a seperate package. That's for a fairly wide-ranging definition of 'useful', too... If it turns out to be an issue, I'd rather drop the binary entirely. In fact, if I can swing it, I'd rather just not package this one, since nothing else uses it (that I know of... someone may have decided to inline the code into their own source tree). However, I won't know that I can drop it for sure until next weekend at the earliest. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Paul "TBBle" Hampson, B.Sc, LPI, MCSE On-hiatus Asian Studies student, ANU The Boss, Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361) Paul.Hampson@Pobox.Com Of course Pacman didn't influence us as kids. If it did, we'd be running around in darkened rooms, popping pills and listening to repetitive music. -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.1/au/ -----------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
pgpxd2yDKFUkq.pgp
Description: PGP signature