Re: RFS: MMS - My Media System
Am Sonntag, 11. März 2007 schrieb Ricardo Mones:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:34:56 +0100
>
> Roman Müllenschläder <info@prodeia.de> wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 23. Januar 2007 schrieben Sie:
> > > > I filed the ITP and it was accepted as:
> > > > -
> > > > Bug#408099: ITP: mms -- My Media System - a complete Mediasuite for
> > > > various devices
> > > > -
> > > >
> > > > So, I'm keen on whats next ;)
> >
> > Some time hs gone now and I would like to rerequest sponsorship on the
> > packages for MMS (My Media System), a complete media suit for various
> > devices.
> >
> > Package name : mms
> > Version : 1.0.8.2-1
> > Upstream author: Anders Rune Jensen <anders@gnulinux.dk>
> > URL : http://www.mymediasystem.com
> > License : GPL
> > Section : sound
> > Package URL : http://www.prodeia.de/mms/
> >
> > It builds these binaries:
> > mms-common - My Media System (common files)
> > mms-standard - My Media System - a complete Mediasuite (SDL, Alsaplayer)
> > mms-slim - My Media System - a complete Mediasuite (SDl, Gstreamer)
> > mms-mpeg - My Media System - a complete Mediasuite (FF-DVB, Alsaplayer)
> >
> > The packages are lintian clean and pbuilder builds them well for Edgy,
> > Sid and Etch.
>
> Not completely, there's some warnings caused by non-executable scripts
> around, and, also an informative hint about splitting the (large)
> arch-independent portion in mms-common in another package (mms-common-data
> fore example) which I think is a good idea in this case. There's also a
> typo in debian/control too (DXR§?) though I'm not sure what these mean, so
> probably the description can be improved a bit.
>
> If you fix these I'll be happy to sponsor the package.
Ok, new packages are online now!
The version has changed (1.0.8.2-1 -> 1.0.8.2-1~rc1) so I'm able to provide
the debs from my local repository for people willing to test. Upstream is
1.0.8.2, so the rc1 is for to make a release in debian as 1.0.8.2-1 and
updating then possible.
I've added mms-common-data with arch indep things and mms-theme (separate
package) with an alternative theme (not as important).
I've build all packages with pbuilder and did the corresponding lintian tests.
It would be cool if you could have a look at the packages and tell if anything
is left what has to be done. Maybe even a look into rules if it complies to
all needs ...
If all is well, I'm glad ;) If not, I'll fix according to tipps. Hope the
dependencies in control are set right ...
There's one little problem left. The upstream has a bug making it crash with
german locale ;( I could fix that with adding a dpatch, but haven't done yet!
The fix is up in upstream's devel (bzr) and I hope we get another bug-fix
release (1.0.8.3) very soon. So what would be better? Fix with dpatch and
upload or wait for new upstream?
Anyway ... my main aim are clean upload-ready packages! And that is what you
can tell me ;)
Lg
Roman
Reply to: