On 07/12/20 12:04 +0530, Kumar Appaiah said ... > On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:49:53AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > > Notice that refblas3-dev is _before_ lapack3-dev. Now, if apt-get is > > called faithfully in this order, atlas does not come in. But if it is > > reordered, the lapack3-dev dependencies are honoured first, and that > > pulls in atlas3-base, which is the first alternate dependency, and is > > satisfiable. > > > > Now, the question is, where is the reordering occurring? sbuild? > > And the answer is, that the dsc file itself has it ordered! The > generated dsc file has ordered B-Deps. > > I think this has to do with the dpkg-dev refactoring. I'll find out if > a bug is warranted, though I'd appreciate more input. IMO, this isn't a bug. The order in which packages are listed in the build-depends shouldn't matter. Build-Depends: lapack3-dev | refblas3-dev or Build-Depends: refblas3-dev | lapack3-dev (if you please) is what you want to use really. Giridhar -- Y Giridhar Appaji Nag | http://www.appaji.net/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature