On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:57:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:47:16 +0200 > Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> wrote: > > > Pierre THIERRY schrieb: > > > > > Among my 5 packages waiting at mentors.d.n, only the two more recents > > > close ITP bugs. Would it be better practice if I issue a new Debian > > > revisions for the 3 others after opening an ITP bug, with a changelog > > > closing the latter? > > > > ITP bugs are not required. > > ITP bugs are required by most sponsors. As DD's, you and I are free to > skip ITP bugs but maintainers needing sponsorship should file an ITP. But ITP bugs reduce work duplication. It's better to have them. -- GPG-Key: 0xA3FD0DF7 - 9F73 032E EAC9 F7AD 951F 280E CB66 8E29 A3FD 0DF7 Debian User and Developer. Homepage: www.foolab.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature