My upstream's copyright statements in source files contain the old FSF mailing address. I will contact them about this problem but, while they react should I a) Faithfully reproduce their copyright statement in the package's debian/copyright and give wrong information to users, or b) Use the current address, at the cost of not using upstream's licence statement verbatim. ? Thanks, -- Rodrigo Gallardo GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature