Re: anyone give me some advice about split scim-bridge
ZhengPeng Hou <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> hi all,
> I've already splited scim-brodge into scom-brodge-agent
> scim-brodge-client-gtk, scim-bridge-client-qt, and scim-bridge(a
> dumy package for upgrade), but now the upstream has added qt4
> support, so shall I split it into five? likde -agent, -client-gtk
> -client-qt3, and -client-qt4? is this scheme ok?
Is there any significant difference between the two to give a reason to
justify having both? If not, I'd just pick the best supported one and
just package that.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.