[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?



Hi,
* Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com> [2007-05-06 12:51]:
> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work?
> 
> Would a 'review without ITS' be done by a simple reply to the RFS
> without a subject marking?

Yes I think so, this way we don't have to read the email 
anymore.
Kind regards
Nico
-- 
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - nion@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.
http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html

Attachment: pgpwCQqlcSfQn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: