Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
From: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 05:48:06 -0500
Message-id: <20070506104806.GB25543@lisa.rodrigo.nul-unu.com>
In-reply-to: <20070506102010.GB26263@ngolde.de>
References: <1178441920.2814.58.camel@localhost> <20070506102010.GB26263@ngolde.de>

On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work?

Would a 'review without ITS' be done by a simple reply to the RFS
without a subject marking?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
  - From: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>
- Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
  - From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>

References:
- request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
  - From: Bart Martens <bartm@debian.org>
- Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
  - From: Nico Golde <nico@ngolde.de>

Prev by Date: Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
Next by Date: Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
Previous by thread: Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
Next by thread: Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread