On Sunday 25 March 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr> writes: > > Russ Allbery wrote: > >> If I were you, I'd document in README.Debian how the administrator can > >> mount the images in /xen (or perhaps /srv/xen) and perhaps provide > >> some configuration that makes it simple for the sysadmin to do so. > >> For the FHS reasons, it shouldn't be the default (perhaps the admin is > >> already using /xen for something completely different), but if the > >> admin *chooses* to put them there, there's no reason why you can't > >> make it easy. > > > > Would you consider that asking for this path in Debconf would be a good > > thing? That way I can ask if /xen should be used, right? (and maybe > > default to /srv/xen as you suggested as it's better than > > /a/way/too/far/in/the/tree) > > I think it depends on how likely you feel it is that the user of this > package is going to want to customize the path. > > I think different people have different takes on this, but the way I look > at Debconf questions is that they should be reserved for the stuff that > essentially everyone installing the package is going to have to decide. Differentiating among questions everyone has to see and other questions is what the priority is for, from debconf-devel(7): The priority field tells debconf how important it is that this question be shown to the user. The priority values are: low Very trivial items that have defaults that will work in the vast majority of cases; only control freaks see these. medium Normal items that have reasonable defaults. high Items that don’t have a reasonable default. critical Items that will probably break the system without user intervention > They're intrusive when installing multiple systems, they require special > handling for unattended installs, and it gets rather annoying to page > through screens of them. questions shown on install are dependend on what the user has set as his debconf-priority, so the amount of questions you get is configurable (and default is high or above IIRC) > Debian has generally reduced the number of Debconf questions one has to > deal with in my experience, and I think that's a good thing. s/debconf questions/high priority debconf questions/ > But if basically everyone using the package is > going to need to make a decision, they're a good thing. > > I don't know the specifics of your package. The impression I got was > that a default somewhere in /var would be fine, just a little annoying. > To me, that doesn't quite meet the bar for a Debconf question, even at > low priority. But it may be that directly accessing the images is way > more common than the impression I got. sounds like an candidate for a low priority debconf question to me -- Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
Attachment:
pgpbHchKRzahO.pgp
Description: PGP signature