[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Fwd: Re: gbonds_2.0.2-7_i386.changes REJECTED



I sent the following message to my sponsor, but haven't heard back yet.
I welcome any assistance anyone can provide.

Thanks,
Richard

> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 12:06 +0000, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > rejected, you missed to mention the difference of the license in help/*
> > Also you need to find out if its ok to go in main with that license, see the vote
> > on GFDL.
> 
> As you can see, gbonds was rejected. I did a Google search and found the
> vote on the GFDL, and it seems to be mostly about invariant sections.
> 
> I added a note about the license to the copyright file. The file now
> looks like this:
> 
> -----
> This package was debianized by Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com> on
> Mon, 10 Apr 2006 23:34:33 -0500.
> 
> It was downloaded from http://gbonds.sourceforge.net/download/
> 
> Copyright Holder: Jim Evins <evins@snaught.com>
> 
> License:
> 
>    This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>    it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
>    the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
>    (at your option) any later version.
> 
>    This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
>    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
>    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
>    GNU General Public License for more details.
> 
>    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
>    along with this package; if not, write to the Free Software
>    Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301 USA
> 
> On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
> Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL'.
> 
> The documentation in the help directory is licensed as follows:
>     
>     Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
>     document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
>     Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software
>     Foundation with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no
>     Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the license can be found in the file
>     COPYING-DOCS which shipped as part of this package.
> -----
> 
> Is that the right way to deal with it?
> 
> Now, is that license acceptable for Debian? If not, what can I do? Do I
> make a gbonds-doc binary package and ship it in non-free? Do I need to
> pull the help directory even from the source package?
> 
> Thanks,
> Richard
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: