Hi Thijs, Thanks very much for your comments. On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 05:37:28PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > * debian/copyright does not seem to list that most of the contents of > the lib/ dir are licenced under the LGPL. - Added the mention about libart being LGPL to the debian/copyright > * debian/compat: Since you depend on debhelper >=5, you could increase > the compatibility level to 5 aswell. - Changed compat to 5 (I could have sworn, I had done that already, but obviously I hadn't :) > * debian/patches: your patch filenames have some very generic names, > like "05-bugfix.dpatch", and the patches themselves do not have > a description inside it. Might be useful to add a description of > the patch, so it's clear to anyone else looking at the package what > the intention is. - Added descriptions to the dpatch files > Otherwise, it looks ok, but at least the first point needs to be > addressed to make the package suitable for upload. > > Thijs The new files are in http://www.mediasitomo.com/debian-swftools/ Simo -- :r ~/.signature
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature