Re: Bug#361376: Can liferea-gtkhtml be removed from etch?
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 06:15:15PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> Yes, Lars has stated his intention to completely remove this rendering
> To do so, I'd assume the right way to go would be to turn -gtkhtml
> into a dummy package that pulls -xulrunner in.
> In that case, the separate liferea-xulrunner package would be rather
> pointless, as liferea would just pull it inconditionally. Should both
> packages be just merged into one? Would *that* be too much of a change
> to get into etch?
It would be less disruptive to drop the liferea-gtkhtml package or make it
an empty package depending on liferea-xulrunner, rather than to risk getting
package relationships wrong when merging the contents. Please go for one of
those first options.
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.