Re: RFS: blacs-pvm (updated package)
Hi James,
On 9/30/06, James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net> wrote:
On (29/09/06 22:13), Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On 9/26/06, James Westby <jw+debian@jameswestby.net> wrote:
> > * Please drop the use of ${Source-Version}, see
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/09/msg00228.html
>
> I read all the thread including [1] and [2]. I think the part of the
> code that you mentioned above is into control file. I did tests and I
> didn't have success when I changed Source by binary.
It should work, note that the field is ${binary:Version} with a colon
now.
I'm going to try again, because I want to improve the packages which I maintain.
> I was reading the
> code of one package that you maintain [libksba] and you use
> ${Source-Version} instead of ${source-Version} which is the correct
> form :S Well, If we are talking about that variable into control file.
Yes, I do not practice what I preach.
This package is involved in an important dependency chain (indeed a
Priority: Important chain), so it was decided to keep the old variable
to make backports easier. We will probably change post-etch to the new
variable though.
My comment was because for doing my watch file I followed your
packages like examples, you know, for having an idea. And I read the
USCAN's man page [0], too.
Thanks :-)
Regards,
[0] http://dehs.alioth.debian.org/uscan.html
--
Muammar El Khatib.
Linux user: 403107.
Key fingerprint = 90B8 BFC4 4A75 B881 39A3 1440 30EB 403B 1270 29F1
http://muammarelkhatib.net | http://www.teorex.org
,''`.
: :' :
`. `'
`-
Reply to: