[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: bottlerocket



also sprach Margarita Manterola <margamanterola@gmail.com> [2006.08.06.1535 +0100]:
> >      * don't forget to acknowledge the NMUs by closing the bugs fixed
> >        in NMUs with the appropriate version:
> 
> This is not how it's supposed to be done now.  The upload has to
> be done, including the changes from the NMU.  This is the duty of
> the sponsor, but it's important to remind whoever is going to make
> the upload that it has to be done including the changes from the
> latest version.
> 
> To do this, the sponsor needs to build the package with
> -v$previous_version

I agree your method is preferable, marga, but at least according to
[0], both are okay

0. http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-ack-nmu

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
scientists will study your brain to learn
more about your distant cousin, man.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Reply to: