[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: optional building of a package



On 6/3/06, Franz Pletz <fpletz@franz-pletz.org> wrote:
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 01:46:35PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> ambiguous names (convert, makegunplut, project) which will not be useful

Please keep in mind that there's already a convert binary in
imagemagick, so you should either not install those to /usr/bin and
distribute them for instance under /usr/share or not at all.

Hum... shouldn't they be distributed under /usr/lib/packagename?
As I know, /usr/share is only for arch independent stuff and convert
and other programs are binary files.

Best regards,
Nelson



Reply to: