On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 01:16:34AM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 12:42:26PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote: > > Finally, the ELF file uses only 68KB, while the whole package uses 1,5 > > MB of arch-independent files. It certainly looks as a candidate for > > package and package-data splitting. What do you think about that? > > Sounds like a good idea, I hadn't thought about it. A small problem with it though: When I put all architecture independant data in its own package, lintian starts complaining that the binary lacks a manpage. For the moment, I moved the manpage back in the arch:any package (it's small anyway), but that doesn't seem to be a good solution. Is an override in order for this? Or is there a better solution? Thanks, Bas -- I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org). If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader. Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word. Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either. For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature