[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: rar (non-free package - I'm sure you all know what rar is!)



Hi Martin,

On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 12:19 +0000, Martin Meredith wrote:
> The package I've just uploaded to mentors.debian.net, [...]
 Two minor problems for the first look. Please close your ITA with the
new maintainer line; close _either_ #280595 or #337940 with the new
upstream release line. Also a cosmetic one: copyright has more than one
empty line after you declare that you made your changes as well.
But why do you need libstdc++5-3.3-dev for building rar? It seems to be
building correctly without it. Anyway, by now libstdc++6-4.0-dev should
be used if it needed. But it would come in anyway due to build-essential
dependency; thus I really don't see why do you need a libstdc++
development package.
 About unrar: I would be happier to sponsor that, because that's the way
rar can you away - rar creates only more archives. :-(

Regards,
Laszlo/GCS

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: