Re: Subject: RFS: mantis (updated package)
Hi Daniel,
i have just finished my work on the package. My changes are:
* the ones you mentioned - everything should be okay now
* (re)added a debian/po directory and template files for translators
* Changed Upstream URL to mantisbugtracking.com as Michael told me
Incoming queue of m.d.o is stil stalled. Therefore i uploaded it to my
private webspace again:
- URL: http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis
- dget
http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis/mantis_1.0.6-1.dsc
Best Regards
Patrick
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Patrick Schönfeld wrote:
>> http://just-imho.net/~schoenfeld/debian-devel/mantis_1.0.6-1.dsc
>
> you're using patches, nevertheless you're modifying core/checkin.php, is
> this intentional?
>
> * NEWS: don't use two (or more) empty lines as seperator, one
> is just enough.
>
> * README.LDAP: remove the ueseless empty line at the end of the file.
>
> * changelog: remove the empty lines at the end of the file.
>
> * This:
>
> ---snip---
> Upstream URL: http://www.mantisbt.org
> ---snap---
>
> should be this:
>
> ---snip---
> Homepage: http://www.matisbt.org
> ---snap---
>
> also note the two leading spaces.
>
> * This '|apache-perl' should be this '| apache-perl'
>
> * dirs is useless here.
>
> * mantis.dirs, mantis.example has a useless empty line at the end.
>
> * remove the useless commented stuff in watch
>
> * you're lacking a build-depends on dpatch
>
> * if you're including the dpatch.make in rules, you can skip the
> definition of patch/unpatch targets. look at 9base for an example.
>
> * this is ugly:
>
> ---snip---
> #! /bin/sh -e
> ---snap---
>
> this is beautiful:
>
> ---snip---
> #!/bin/sh -e
> ---snap---
>
> in your dpatch headers. Additionally, you may want also fix the
> author information:
>
> This is ugly:
>
> ---snip---
> by <schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com>
> ---snap---
>
> This is beautiful:
>
> ---snip---
> by Patrick Schönfeld <schoenfeld@in-medias-res.com>
> ---snap---
>
> * what is debian/patches/DPATCH intended to be for?
>
> if you fix above things, i'll sponsor mantis.
>
Reply to: