Re: shebang lines

To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: shebang lines
From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:58:06 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87lkm5wzkh.fsf_-_@florent.maison>
Mail-followup-to: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 456134A0.7060802@debian.org> (Daniel Baumann's message of "Mon, 20 Nov 2006 05:52:48 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 455F9E57.5000605@calno.com> <[🔎] 45605576.8000304@debian.org> <[🔎] 87zmanqbru.fsf@florent.maison> <[🔎] 456134A0.7060802@debian.org>

Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org> wrote:

> If in doubt, one should use the one without space, though.

Because, well... because. Riiiiiiiiiight.

-- 
Florent

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: shebang lines
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

References:
- RFS: gcin
  - From: caleb <caleb@calno.com>
- Re: RFS: gcin
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: gcin
  - From: Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr>
- Re: RFS: gcin
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: meep
Next by Date: Re: shebang lines
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: gcin
Next by thread: Re: shebang lines
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread